Skip to main content

Indian Universities - Rankings

Just like the status of India in the world of football (SOCCER, yet to fly their flag @FIFA); the Indian universities are yet to make any mark in the academic world. Why.. why.. why is it that none of the Indian academic institutes have made it to appear in world's top 200 rankings; consistently in the past 3-years. The idea of this post is to bring out the bare facts and also to offer my own personal views for this pathetic show in the academic arena. Arena???, is it a good word, are we saying that the academicians need to be in a race; while many people shrug aside this topic calling it to be a meager "rat race". No, its a measure of where does the institution stands in imparting education and performing research, in a way it reflects on the worthiness of everything; YES, it is indeed to make one realize whether the students one trains, after all have to enter the ARENA and hence the correct word.

Ranking: Weightage Factors
Credit : TIMES higher education rankings
As we wind up the year 2013 (today being the last day); we learned 2-reports, first, the Indian Universities faring badly among the BRICS countries; next, a miserable performance among the World Rankings. Lets analyze the first work done by the TIMES higher education UK group in gauging the academic institutions among the FIVE (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) major emerging national economies. The assessment seems to have been based on four major issues (complete details):  While 1. teaching (30%), 2. research (30%), 3. citations (30%) carry a large chunk, the remaining 10% is calculated upon the industry income and international outlook. In addition, there were 13-carefully calibrated performance indicators; trusted by students, academicians and industry and governments. There is a minimum bar of around 200-published papers an year starting from 2007 and the institutions must teach undergraduate programs; with few exceptions permitted.

Coming back to what Indian universities have done among BRICS: while China grabbed 4-slots among the top-10 (including 1st, 2nd); Punjab University was placed at rank-13 (we are NOT averse to this number!!). The other institute to represent India is IIT-Khargapur standing long long away at 30. There are 6-more institutes (so, 8-among 50) within the 50-bracket; the notable one being Jadavpur university at 47 and Aligarh at 50.

What can we say about this performance:
Lets get some opinion from Phil Batey, editor, Times Education Higher Rankings, UK; as per his interview appearing in the Hindu, he attributes the no.1 slot for Peiking university is primarily due to research impact and industry income along with an excellent teaching credentials. As per Batey, the Chinese government made a significant effort starting from 1990 and pushed for a few number of highly specialized universities into world class level by pouring a significant amount of grants in developing infrastructure and research facilities (Is anybody listening ???). The decision, a political, but very aggressively followed in attracting the reverse brain drain by offering a variety of incentives to the students, faculty coming back to their motherland. While the Punjab university seems to have done exceptionally well due to their research program; which is "globally potential". Commenting on the poor performance of IITs, Batey says IITs lag on research front. He also mentions very categorically that the funds flow towards education is poor in India and hence a poor set of infrastructure in all the educational institutes. Some other good universities were not appearing in the list as they had not participated in their ranking procedures (e.g. Delhi University).

My views:
The simple logic of "what you sow is what you reap" is applicable. As Mr. Batey pointed out, the other developing countries who have made it big are the ones who have spent an enormous amount. It is interesting to come up with the actual numbers spend based on GDP among the BRICS. Though the recruitment procedures are very fair at the central universities and at the IITs in attracting bright researchers from abroad and within the country; what has been noticed is that of terrible deterioration in the research performance of these young faculty after joining. It is absolutely clear that the major reason behind this phenomenon is due to poor infrastructure on pursuing research mixed with many other non-academic reasons which will kill the remaining enthusiasm. While, the lack of funding is playing a detrimental role in the fall of quality research in India, the drying up of faculty strength is another crucial factor in the dwindling scenario of university output. There is a huge uncertainty in the governments to last their 5-year terms; and hence very few long term plans are envisaged in setting up of a esteemed places of higher education.

Can we not identify universities of excellence which can offer world class teaching along with cutting edge research, the ISERS is a good move in this direction. Let us reinforce IITs on their research front; let there be few faculty who are taking less burden of teaching, but performing research alone (assessed by an independent body). No point in spending a fortune on attracting one type of fellowship (calling noble laureates); instead we can call many without the tag. Let there not be an aversion on PRIVATE universities (they are the ones who sent the first probe into the space), if they are bringing competitiveness let us have them into the foray; after all the new entrants need to be wary; not the other way round.

On the occasion of 60th formation day of UGC, Prof. C. Raj Kumar, vice chancellor of  O.P. Jindal Global university has come with a good discussion (the Hindu) on "Building better Universities". While very first table showcases a pathetic show of Indian universities NOT appearing in the top-200 ranks all along the the years 2011, 2012 and 2013; at the same time China, Japan and South Korea taking 4-5 slots on an average among the lists of various bench markings. Raj Kumar has gone in greater depth of the working model of UGC; his comment " The current framework that require universities to be constantly regulated by laws, rules, regulations, guidelines and policies set by the government and the regulatory bodies have not produced the best results".  He emphasized on the issues of quality and accountability which need to be ensured by the regulating body (read UGC). As per this article; India in the pursuit of enhancing the education base (Gross Enrollment Ratio) has some how lost in spending on the research and scholarships.

Bottom line,   Issues to be debated: 
  • How can we enhance investment in Higher education
  • Better ways and means to attract the reverse brain drain
  • Opening the gates for the foreign players (less averse to Private parties)
  • With the given situation; how to improve the standards (lessons from Punjab Univ.)
  • Where should the buck be stopping?? ... Student - Faculty - VC- UGC...........
  • Lack of Industry participation in research
  • ----------
  • ----
N.B.: Here is the: Indian Universities World Rankings 


Another blow to the Indian Educational system; Sept-2014
Here is another news appearing just now : LINK, that the findings of QS-World University Ranking system finds IIT-Bombay holding the best representation from India.... at 222; while few universities (Delhi Univ., Calcutta Univ.) managing to be in the 420-440 range.


Times Ranking-2015... India improves; Dec-2014
India does well... on the expected lines; their top research institute, IISc (Indian Institute of Science) grabs 25th rank into the BRICS league... here are the other Indian institutes....

Credit : Times of India

QS Rankings -2015 by subject:
Indian universities stood up in the subject-wise rankings brought out by the same agency (reference: QS Rankings) where Indian institutions failed miserably as a whole.

Listed here are the 9-institutions from India, which grabbed under-100 rankings subject wise..

1. IIT Bombay:  Art & design, computer science, & information systems, engineering-chemical, civin & structural, electrical & electronic, mechanical, aeronautical & manufacturing, materials science, statistcs & operational research  


2. IIT Delhi:  Computer science & information systems, engineering-chemical, civil stuctural, electrical & electronic, mechanical, aeronautical & manufacturing  


3. IIT Kharagpur:  Engineering-civil & structural, mechanical, aeronautical & manufacturing, material science


4. IIT Madras:  Engineering-civil &structural, electrical & electronic, mechanical, aeronautical & manufacturing  


5. Indian Institute of Science:  Electrical & electronic, materials science  

6. IIT Kanpur:  Statistics & operational research  


7. Jawaharlal Nehru University:  Sociology  


8.Shanmugha Arts Science Technology:  Art & design 


9. University of Delhi:  Development studies


Comments

  1. Nice Review Sir,
    There is no revolution in education system in India. The Education system under the Government will suffer , as the government bodies will decide the limits for it. Education system should be an independent organization . It is only then things will change. To lay blame on students, Faculty or VC UGC is turning fingers on each other. The main goal for the education system is to create a Scientific Mind. And i think the Universities fail completely in doing it . They gave degrees, but cant produce a Scientific mind , Why? The intensity of students towards higher education and brain-drain is motivated by Jobs in the future,not as a result Scientific mind. The ranking should also be made in terms the Scientific mind(the 5th issue) of students and faculty as well. The scientific mind of the university can create its own funds and attract more investments from outside campus. And it is in the freedom of Education sytem from any external organization, such scientific mind is possible.thanks

    ReplyDelete
  2. I fully agree that we must provide complete freedom and autonomy to the educational institutions. But the basic issue is FUNDS.... where are they.. they all have dried up. As was clear from the way the neighboring countries have performed; one need to literally pour huge amount of sums to raise the infra structure and attract the bright minds (within and from abroad).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mere funds would not solve the problem. In my view there are many intangibles which plague our education system. One is the complete indifference of teachers towards their responsibilities. I come from a small town called Guntur, in AP. I know how teachers in most colleges don't teach anything in the classes. They do that at their homes as private tuition. Every student is forced to go for tuition.This is at the undergraduate level.
    People go for teaching only as a last resort. As regards research, we have starved the universities by luring away the best research potential to the organised research institutes like ISRO, BARC, etc. (Today, of course, the UGC scales are good!).
    Look at the leadership of the universities. I did my M.Sc. from the Banras Hindu University in 1956-58. When I joined the VC was CP Ramaswamy Iyer, a great scholar and administrator (He was Diwan of TRavancore). At one time Dr.S. Radhakrishnan, our former President and a great scholar was the VC. And today?
    Most universities VC's are political appointees.
    Thus the disease is at the systemic level. No window dressing will solve the problems. First choose eminent scholars in various disciplines and form a panel. From there choose VCs and give them full freedom to act. Same thing applies to selection of professors. Etc.
    There are many other factors which I wanted mention but today I am rather busy. Some other day. Bye.Manoranjan Rao

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Schiaparelli

The unrelenting European spirit of landing on Mars continues. Mars-3, the first earthling object from USSR, though, had landed on Mars in 1971; it's signals ceased within 14-seconds of soft landing. While USA is sitting pretty with nearly half a dozen rovers roaming Martian surface, the last probe from European Space Agency (ESA/UK), Beagle-2 (2003) while almost making it to the surface of Mars but failed to send the signals back home. It was only in 2015, NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter finding it intact on the expected spot on Mars, indicating failure of solar panels to deploy. Here comes another daring attempt by ESA on soft landing Schiaparelli next week. The excitement is immense; a six minute long sequencing of commands have already been loaded into the mother craft (Trace Gas Orbiter, link) cum lander (Schiaparelli).

The famous Italian astronomer, Giovanni Schiaparelli (1835-1910) dedicated his life studying planet Mars. From the ground telescopes (in Europe), he ob…

ASTROSAT vs The Giant Hubble

A TV program on the legendary Hubble Space Telescope, HST (Hubble's Cosmic Journey, National Geographic), prompted me to write this piece on the recently launched Indian space telescope called ASTROSAT.  The purpose of Hubble Space Telescope is to break the barrier of 1-arc second seeing limit (full moon is about 1,800 arc-seconds across) from the ground which arises due to the atmospheric disturbances. NASA had achieved this by a mammoth effort of grinding a 2.4-meter glass to the curvature accuracy of 1/800,000 th of an inch and placing the school bus size object weighing 11,110-kg in 550-km orbit. ASTROSAT is India's  multi-wavelength telescope geared to look at the stellar objects primarily in UV, X-ray regions of the EM spectrum. In that TV program, the sweet voice of John Grunsfeld conveying his strong bond he had created in repairing the Hubble more than one time. Hubble is the most sophisticated optical experiment of humans in the space which has been working for 25-y…

India need Nano satellites; Future of Space Sciences

Sputnik 1 was the first human endeavour to leave mother earth (October, 1957) to be able to wander into Space. Though it was a small satellite ( ~ 83 kg), the later attempts by humans to explore space (Low Earth Orbit, LEO) were becoming increasingly bulky. The exploitation of geo-synchronous orbit (36,000 km) for beaming telecommunication and other signals could only add more burden on building huge work horses (Envisat ~ 8,000 kg). The present discussion is limited to Nano-Satellites, which fall in the 1-10 kg weight category; while Micro- satellites are in 100-10 kg and Pico satellites under 1-kg.

As the miniaturisation in electronic components (MEMS) started, so was the aerospace industry turning to COTS (Commercial, Off-the-Shelf) based small satellites. The idea was to try out newer technology riding on tiny satellites (Micro / Nano) even if the sub-components are not of very expensive MIL (military) grade, meaning radiation hardened class.  In came a "golden standard"…